I think what you are looking for is at:
 
 http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/dfhp3c00/1.3.4.1


I am not positive that this "matches my memory" but what it shows there is
that BOTH EXEC CICS RETURN and GoBack are valid from a COBOL subprogram
entered via EXEC CICS LINK or Dynamic CALL. However, what level they go back
to "depends" 

 

"Bartosz R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 13 Sie, 15:44, Kevin Wailes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 13 Aug, 07:31, Bartosz R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> >
> > > does anyone know whether or not it is allowed to GOBACK from a COBOL
> > > program that was EXEC CICS LINKed? Are there any repercussions of
> > > this? The IBM manual for the CICS TS 3.1 says:
> >
> > > Return from subprogram
> > > LINK
> > > The linked subprogram must return using either RETURN or a native
> > > language return command such as the COBOL statement GOBACK.
> >
> > > If I read it correctly there is no difference, whether I issue the
> > > EXEC CICS RETURN or GOBACK. Is that true? How about the CICS logical
> > > level, which is supposed to be increased by LINK and decreased by
> > > RETURN?
> > > Thanks in advance
> >
> > You can use either but what happens depends on how your subprogram is
> > invoked. There's a fairly comprehensive description in the
> > Infocentre :
> >
> >
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cicsts/v3r1/index.jsp?topic=...-
Ukryj cytowany tekst -
> >
> 
> Well, that's what I though also. But the aforementioned sentence
> states that even when you LINK a program you can ISSUE a GOBACK
> instead of EXEC CICS RETURN (which IMHO is not true). The sentence I
> quoted comes from exactly that infocenter article. Can anyone help?
> Should I just experiment with this?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to