On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:07:46 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>BTW, just sorting by CPU-TIME descending, here is what I see as the top 20 since the last IPL (note that CICS regions get recycled). MII is #11. > >It's not the total CPU-TIME consumed that matters. >Rather, it's the pecentage in use. >Some tasks do a lot of work at IPL time, then just coast. Over a long period of time those that only used cycles at IPL time would not show up at the top of the list. If you looked at the names I posted you would see that none of them fell into that category. Anyway, my purpose for posting them was to show that MII did show up as #11 in the list. It is higher in the list on other systems that don't run busy production online subsystems. But if it only increases it's current CPU usage by 10% (not CPU percent, MIM's percentage of increase), then that probably is ok. At #11, it has used 1/8 the amount of CPU time than the #1 task on the list (a production DB2 DBM1 asid). But then I have to think about that increase across 8 LPARs. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
