Question: Is *short* service window acceptable?
If yes then *no tool* and *no consultancy* is needed, despite of the
data amount or volume geometry (more precisely: models).
In fact only few system volumes and DB2 need special tool or outage,
vast majority of data can moved on the fly.
I don't know Model 204 database, so don't speak about it.
My €0.02
Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I'd recommend that you take a strong look at Innovation's FDRPAS. Way easier to set up, run, and monitor than TDMF. But both will get the job
done.
1. If the contract covers TDMF, why spend the money.
2. I've used both, and did not find issues with either.
Contrary to another post I saw, neither is recommended for moving active paging volumes, so you will need to either PAGEADD, PAGEDEL, or IPL
for those.
3. We did it, two years ago, with no IPLs.
4. 11.2 TB.
Everything else, JES spool, checkpoint, etc. should be OK.
5. For us, all was.
-
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy
XII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego,
nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 0000025237
NIP: 526-021-50-88
Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2008 r. kapitał zakładowy BRE Banku SA wynosi
118.642.672 złote i został w całości wpłacony.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
