That's true, until you get an operator that's too lazy tocrack open a
manual, whether to look up a message or try and learn something new, and
he's also too **** gutless to accept any responsibilities. And a
management team that's too soft-hearted (or soft-headed) to do anything
about it. BTDTGTSS!
I'm sure Bob Richards remembers "The Chairbreaker"! :-)
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
It should be no surprise that with a philosophy of removing
responsibility
from operators that they would act irresponsibly. My experience is that
operators who are treated with respect and given responsibility do good
work. Attempts to make a shop "operator-proof" don't work as well, IMO.
Exactly. The deeper the bench, the better the team.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
