On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:49:09 -0400, Jack Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..."If a SAF solution isn't available to the originator" means that the >user can not get a SAF profile for his DSN >... Something doesn't make sense to me here. If "a SAF solution isn't available" means a SAF product isn't installed, then protecting that one dataset doesn't make much sense to me. The whole system is a house of cards just ready to collapse around that secure PDS. (Ok. I've got blinders on. Maybe there is a realistic environment like that, but I'd like to be convinced.) If, on the other hand it means "can not get a SAF profile for his DSN" then I'd suggest a greater effort be made or an alternative be found. I know that many security groups have obscure rules to be followed, but it's usually easier to get them to restrict access than to grant access. Or could the original poster be trying to restrict access to data that is, by law or by corporate dictate, not to be limited? (I'm not sure such a thing exists.) Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
