On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:23:44 -0500, John McKown wrote: > >Why the XMIT at the end instead of another TERSE? Because TERSE'ing the PDS >would likely just use CPU with little futher compression. > Yes, but XMIT expands it somewhat with control sequences.
>Of course step 2 assumes that you have a single volume with enough space to >contain the PDS with all the members. If this is not true, then I'd likely >download each TERSE'd dataset to my desktop. Once on my desktop, I'd use >"zip" without compression to combine the TERSE'd datasets into a single >"zip" file. > What's the advantage of zip without compression over pax? tar? Dammit! why won't AMATERSE tolerate HFS files, NFS files, or POSIX pipes allocated with JCL or DYNALLOC as its TERSE'd datasets? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
