Also, in the Ops note he had 125 Storing data set TTSMV14.JAVA.HFS(SDK) > > >>> 550 TTSMV14.JAVA.HFS is a partitioned data set and no member was > > >>> specified on the STOR command.
Which is why the message about the PDS was produced. Lizette > > I agree that the dataset TYPE is HFS but the DSORG is PO. However, I > do not > think you can edit it like a PO data set. I do believe you have to > mount it > and use the O'commands or ISHELL, or OMVS to actually work with it. > > So the message about the PDS is a little misleading and probably IBM > needs > to look more closely at how the HFS is treated. > > But, since IBM is going to put all of their future enhancements in zFS > and > not HFS, it maybe a moot point. > > Personally, I would have downloaded JAVA from the web directly to my > HFS > file on MVS and skipped the PC to mainframe upload part. > > > > Lizette > > > > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:19:47 -0500, Paul Gilmartin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:34:59 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote: > > > > > >>Check your allocation of your HFS it is not a PDS dataset > > >>TTSMV14.JAVA.HFS > > >> > > >>It should say HFS for data set type > > >> > > >Yes, but IIRC for DSNTYPE=HFS, DSORG=PO. ?!?! Thus the absurd > > >message. > > > > I agree. This sort of thing convinces me that the HFS implementation > is > > layered on top of PDS-E support, somehow. > > > > > > > >>> 550 TTSMV14.JAVA.HFS is a partitioned data set and no member was > > >>> specified on the STOR command. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
