On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:14:18 -0600, Brian Westerman wrote: >SyzSpool can attach multiple sub-tasks, and can accept as many files >simultaneously as the JES SAPI Interface can send. Technically it only looks >simultaneous because there are multiple sub-tasks. > >We don't use USS services at creation time, not because we aren't aware of >them, but because the overhead is much greater for the task. USS doesn't >really need to get involved with processing millions of lines of spool >output daily. > Does this mean that it does not write its output to a DNAME using standard sequential access methods?
Or, if it does so write its output to a DDNAME, why may the user not ALLOCATE that DDNAME to a UNIX file? >I have nothing personal against USS, it just isn't necessary for the purpose >I designed SyzSpool to serve. > Ah, but what has become of OS/360's elegant paradigm of device independence? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
