> Simply coding the base entry name on a DD statement is a
> means of processing ALL the generations of a GDG without
> resorting to concatenated DD statements for each generation.
Instead, the system resorts to concatenated DD statements
on your behalf, albeit in reverse chronological sequence.
> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:34:42 +0000
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: GDG QUESTION
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>
> Hi Howard,
>
> I noted that Linda supplied the required answer to your query about:
>
> "The executing job has the following DD in the JCL:
>
> DUMPIN DD DISP=SHR,DSN=PCYC.TMVHSTM.TMVS04.IRR
> and the resulting error is:
>
> IEF212I E18823X PST0010 STEP01 DUMPIN - DATA SET NOT FOUND
>
> Can some one tell me what I'm doing wrong? It's some thing but I just can't
> see the problem."
>
> I WOULD ADD however that your DD statement above is valid if the GDG has
> associated data sets. Simply coding the base entry name on a DD statement is
> a means of processing ALL the generations of a GDG without resorting to
> concatenated DD statements for each generation.
>
> Kind regards - Terry
>
> Terry Sambrooks
_________________________________________________________________
See how Windows® connects the people, information, and fun that are part of
your life
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/119463819/direct/01/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
