On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:13:00 -0600, John McKown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:52:14 -0500, Kempf, Ted
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hey John,  With that SET TIMEZONE... Any issues with duplicate SMF
>>records ?  ..... Ted
>>
>
>Ya know something? I've never looked. So I don't know. Hum.
>
>--
>John

Well, my sandbox LPAR was still an hour ahead. So I ran a job. Did the SET
TIMEZONE. The ran another job. The second job's time stamp was BEFORE the
first job's time stamp. So I would say that the SET TIMEZONE does affect the
date and time in the SMF records. This would make the jobs run for an hour
after the SET TIMEZONE appear with the jobs than ran the hour before the SET
TIMEZONE. And I don't see a way to distinguish.

--
John

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to