Try  (watch the wrap):

http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/resources/servers_eserver_zseries_zos_wlm_
pdf_cmgbatch_pdf_wlm_goal_based_initiator_management.pdf

http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/resources/servers_eserver_zseries_zos_wlm_
pdf_wlminits_pdf_wlminitsjm.pdf


and

http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/resources/servers_eserver_zseries_zos_wlm_
pdf_velocity_pdf_velocity.pdf

for more detail.

The JES2 classification rules should not classify work into common
Service Classes between WLM Managed and JES managed inits.

An appropriately aggressive goal may allow you to do what you want to
do, but since WLM managed inits are sensitive to non-WLM managed work,
the goal may need to be highly aggressive in order to accomplish your
purpose.



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Mattson
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 8:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: /*PRIORITY change without JCL change

        I have been doing RTFM on Jes Init & Tune Guide and find myself 
back in a quandry.  My original purpose was to get an ever changing list

of, overnight batch, critical path,jobs priority access to initiators 
without changing their JCL manually.  But here is what I read in the
Guide 
about WLM inits
        Batch jobs that are part of a critical path, such as the
overnight 
?batch window? should remain in JES managed job classes. 
        Alignment of initiator mode and service classes: All jobs with
the 
same service class should be managed by the same type of initiation. For

example, if job classes A and B are both assigned to the HOTBATCH
service 
class, and JOBCLASS(A) is MODE=WLM, while JOBCLASS(B) is MODE=JES, 
workload management will have a very difficult time managing the goals
of 
the HOTBATCH service class without managing class B jobs. Queue delay 
measurements: If you have large job execution queues, the queue delay
can 
dominate the response time or velocity. This may cause the system to not

address other delays because it would not significantly affect the 
performance index (PI). Response time does not include TYPRUN=HOLD or 
JCLHOLD delays, but does include the following: 
 Operational delays (jobs or job class held by operator command) 
 System or resource affinity delay 
 Scheduling delay because of class limits, duplicate jobnames 
 Time waiting for an Initiator

        What I currently have is a lot of jobs waiting for a class "Q" 
initiator, and I want to get my "loved ones" to the init first.  It
looks 
like using WLM to get my priority jobs to the initiator faster may
totally 
mess up WLM's calculations because it will start measuring all of that 
Waiting for Init Time. 
        I think this puts me back at where I started.  Perhaps what I
need 
is an Exit which can read a list of Jobs and raise their Input Queue 
Priority.  Can anyone suggest the "best" exit for this? 




Brian Westerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
12/03/2008 11:31 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
Expire Date: 12/08/2010


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: /*PRIORITY change without JCL change






You could write it as either a JES input exit (or text) or an SMF exit,
either will work fine. 

There are several samples on the CBT tape that you can use as a start,
but
none that I'm aware of that do exactly what you want. 

Why not use JES's WLM options instead? 

Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to