Thats because the IBMers understood the code and had the source Peter, Thats because the IBMers understood the code and had the source. The customer on the other hand at the time of pre-OCO had the source and the PLMs. Since at the time the source and PLMs were considered the law....<sigh>
After working for now this my second software vendor, first being Legent , no CA-Legent, I understand the source issue. Scott J Ford ________________________________ From: Peter Relson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 8:53:22 AM Subject: Re: OCO, documentation, support from IBM-Main, etc. (was Re: Health Checker questions) >Uh, reduce cost by eliminating Program Logic doc? I assume the PLM >was replaced by something else for internal use. Eliminating doc for >program logic seems like a good way to also eliminate program logic. There's a lot of assuming going on in the posts of the last few days. This assumption too is incorrect in a way. For the most part, no one actually used the PLMs internally either. The information from the PLMs was already available for us within the modules themselves (mostly). Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
