We still have a couple hundred addresses defined on our new Shark as 3380's. I'm not sure exactly why, but they are there. I think we had some software that required 3380s at one time, but I don't think we have any now.
I'm curious - what would be the benefit of getting off of the 3380s? I think that the larger track size might allow a little more data per track, but other than that, why would having 3380s be a problem? Eric ---- Ted MacNEIL <[email protected]> wrote: > > Suppose you use FDR, for example, to copy a Broadcast Dataset from a 3380 > > to a 3390. > > Does anybody still have 3380's? > > I haven't seen one since 1990! > - -- Eric Bielefeld Systems Programmer Washington University St Louis, Missouri 314-935-3418 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
