On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:41:23 -0600, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hard cap the LPAR weights on the HMC for the "unloved" LPARs. That way, they >get __at most__ their weight, regardless of what any other LPAR is doing. >This does introduce more PR/SM overhead to manage the "unloved" LPARs.
That's the first time I've ever heard that (hard capping has more PR/SM overhead). Do you have any documentation or numbers to back that statement up? Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[email protected] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
