We are going to try that next. I was hesitant since I was not sure if that would prevent us from using MODIFY commands against the STC.
The other thing is I was always taught to ensure there were MESSAGE IDs on any messages I produced. It did mot matter if mainframe or other. I am not sure why JAVA seems to think it is soooo special it relies on something else on the mainframe to do it for them. Seems like an inconsistant coding technique in my opinion. Lizette > >Happy New Year to everybody! > >Lizette, >I just read about BPX.CONSOLE and I must say that the description >is rather fuzzy. > >However, my guess is that you have BPX.CONSOLE defined and that >your EKM server's userid is permitted to BPX.CONSOLE. > >If so, as per description of the BPX1CCS, it has to provide it's own >message prefix. Note that this requirement is *not clearly* documented >in the XL C/C++ runtime reference for __console(), so how should >someone coding in C/C++ know about that??. > >I'd try to take the permission to BPX.CONSOLE away from EKM's userid >and see if that helps. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
