I agree that PDSE is here to stay. Static PDSE has been no problem. The OS required ones fall into this category. The ones being updated often and from different systems/plexes are a different story. These cross-boundary update issues have/still apply to PDS if the rules are not followed (GRS, reserve, etc.). All of the problems that I have had have been traced back to sharing issues. All corrected by developer education.
Dennis Roach United Space Alliance 600 Gemini Avenue Mail Code USH-4A3L Houston, Texas 77058 Voice: (281) 282-2975 Page: (713) 736-8275 Fax: (281) 282-3583 E-Mail: [email protected] All opinions expressed by me are mine and may not agree with my employer or any person, company, or thing, living or dead, on or near this or any other planet, moon, asteroid, or other spatial object, natural or manufactured, since the beginning of time. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: > If there is even a hint of a perception of integrity issues, then there > is still a problem. But, Dave Gibney's point is well taken. You can't run z/OS without PDSE. So, issues or not, PDSE is here to stay. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [email protected] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
