>I think you missed the forest for the trees. Do you have to editorialise, when somebody asks a question? I did say I didn't know.
>Even if the blocksize were 23000 or larger, the blocks would still be 800 >because each member is one block, and each block is ten records of 80 bytes. >A larger blocksize would be useful only if users had more than one member >(already ruled out in previous messages). Thank you for the answer, at least. I did say I hadn't used it since the 1980's, so I didn't know. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
