Do you think the MAN files will need to be increased in order to support this PTF?
I like the idea about having an SMF record to go back and see who did what to whom, but it might put more stress on a busy PDS/PDSE updating system. Lizette > >Now this is interesting (to me). APAR OA25205. > >PROBLEM SUMMARY: > **************************************************************** > * USERS AFFECTED: Users of DFSMS that use PDS or PDSE data * > * sets that require an SMF audit trail at * > * the member level. * > **************************************************************** > * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: Currently, BPAM and DESERV will create * > * an SMF 42 record when a PDS or PDSE * > * directory is initialized and when * > * individual members are deleted. * > * However, BPAM and DESERV does not * > * provide an audit trail at the member * > * level when PDS or PDSE members are * > * added, updated and renamed. SMF type * > * 42 records should be enhanced to * > * provide new subtypes when a PDS or PDSE * > * member for STOW ADD/REPLACE/CHANGE and * > * DESERV PUT/RENAME. * > **************************************************************** > * RECOMMENDATION: * > **************************************************************** > BPAM and DESERV must provide an SMF 42 record when a PDS or PDSE > member is added, replaced or renamed. > >-- >John > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
