The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computer as well.

[email protected] (R.S.) writes:
> I don't believe! I know pure H2O is dielectric, but it is virtually
> impossible to keep it so clean especially in contact with metal (I
> assume the conductors were metallic).
> So I think, the water had to be *isolated*. That's all. I saw some
> study of cooling power generator conductors (22kV, ??kA). Tubes (skin
> effect). The goal was to have the liquid circulation insulated. It is
> feasible even assuming fill up.
>
> Regarding to "z11" water cooling: what's wrong with water cooling???
> Why should we be ashamed of water cooling?
> Is it old-fashioned? Dino-like?
> Really? Look at newest graphic cards and CPU in PC game high-end boxes.
> They almost require liquid cooling. Liquid cooling means hi-tech
> nowadays. "The most sophisticated" (sales pitch quotation) rack
> solutions are water-cooled.

re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009b.html#46 Z11 - Water cooling?

there is old folklore of the 3081 TCM modules ... with closed system
liquid cooling, heat exchange, and liquid on the outboard side to handle
all the heat.

one of the stories is that there was thermal sensors ... that would kill
the power (to keep from melting) ... but no flow sensors on the outboard
cooling side. a customer lost flow on the outboard flow side ... but by
the time the thermal sensors tripped the power, it was too late
... there was so much heat on the inboard side ... that they lost the
TCMs. After that, customer sites were retrofitted with flow sensors on
the outboard side of the heat exchange (that would kill power, before
the heat had started to build up enough to trip the thermal sensors).

some TCM URL references
http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/attic2/attic2_015.html
http://domino.watson.ibm.com/tchjr/journalindex.nsf/c469af92ea9eceac85256bd50048567c/5b94a637584c972785256bfa0067f507?OpenDocument
http://ibmcollectables.com/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=album122
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_3081
http://www.vm.ibm.com/devpages/LUNSFORD/rdl_prof.html

recent post mentioning 4341s being used to test 3081 TCMs:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009b.html#22 Evil weather

one of the issues with TCMs was that field engineers could no longer do
"bootstrap" diagnostics that started with scoping. approach in 3081 was
a "service processor" that had probes into all the TCMs ... and the
"service processor" was "scopable" (field engineers could
diagnose/replace the service processor ... and then use the service
processor to diagnose the rest of the machine).

with the increase in requirements and sophistication of "service
processor", for the 3090, it was initially decided to go with 4331
running a highly modified version of vm370 release 6, and all the
screens/menus done in CMS IOS3270. By the time 3090 shipped, the
4331 had been replaced by a pair of 4361s (redundant machines
as alternative to having to diagnose the machine in the field) ...
still running highly modified version of vm370 release 6 (and
all the screens done in CMS IOS3270).

misc past posts mentioning TCMs
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000b.html#36 How to learn assembler language for 
OS/390 ?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000b.html#37 How to learn assembler language for 
OS/390 ?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000b.html#38 How to learn assembler language for 
OS/390 ?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#61 "all-out" vs less aggressive designs 
(was: Re: 36 to 32 bit transition)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#7 hot chips and nuclear reactors
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#3 Microcode? (& index searching)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#5 Microcode? (& index searching)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002d.html#13 IBM Mainframe at home
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#20 What goes into a 3090?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#10 What is microcode?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004n.html#15 360 longevity, was RISCs too close to 
hardware?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004n.html#22 Shipwrecks
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004p.html#35 IBM 3614 and 3624 ATM's
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004p.html#36 IBM 3614 and 3624 ATM's
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004p.html#41 IBM 3614 and 3624 ATM's
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005b.html#51 History of performance counters
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005h.html#13 Today's mainframe--anything to new?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006r.html#36 REAL memory column in SDSF
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007g.html#23 The Perfect Computer - 36 bits?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007g.html#29 The Perfect Computer - 36 bits?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007h.html#9 21st Century ISA goals?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007t.html#77 T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe 
Monopoly
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008d.html#52 Throwaway cores
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008h.html#80 Microsoft versus Digital Equipment 
Corporation

-- 
40+yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar70

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to