I know what I did wrong. I inadvertently (well, I was testing
a change to an ISPF edit macro) submitted a job with an SMP/E
APPLY step with an instream SMPCNTL with RECFM=VB. It's easy
to suspect that SMP/E contains a DCB with a hardcoded RECFM=FB.
The result:
SDSF OUTPUT DISPLAY I70APP JOB06043 DSID 2 LINE 18 COLUMNS 01- 80
COMMAND INPUT ===> SCROLL ===> CSR
14.25.44 JOB06043 IEC020I 001-4,I70APP ,APPLY ,SMPCNTL ,JES
14.25.44 JOB06043 IEC020I EROPT IS 'ABE' OR NOT SPECIFIED
14.25.44 JOB06043 IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 514
514 SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=001
514 TIME=14.25.44 SEQ=00341 CPU=0000 ASID=0030
514 PSW AT TIME OF ERROR 078D1000 00961A1C ILC 2 INTC 0D
514 NO ACTIVE MODULE FOUND
514 NAME=UNKNOWN
514 DATA AT PSW 00961A16 - 00181610 0A0D1851 A7C80048
514 AR/GR 0: C41C5D16/80000000 1: 00000000/80001000
514 2: 00000000/00961EB0 3: 00000000/00006168
514 4: 00000000/000060A0 5: 00000000/005CA014
514 6: 00000000/005FF048 7: 00000000/00961638
514 8: 00000000/000672CC 9: 00000000/0000611C
514 A: 00000000/005C9FE8 B: 00000000/4096165E
514 C: 00000000/005D8030 D: 00000000/00006228
514 E: 00000000/00000000 F: 00000000/00000000
514 END OF SYMPTOM DUMP
14.25.44 JOB06043 IEF450I I70APP APPLY - ABEND=S001 U0000 REASON=00000000 515
515 TIME=14.25.44
14.25.44 JOB06043 -APPLY *S001 212 144 .00 .00 .0
This tells me hardly anything about what was wrong. Would
a SYNADAF have returned a buffer with more information?
Can a customer reasonably expect that a developer would
have coded the SYNADAF and displayed the reply in SMPOUT,
job log, or elsewhere. I don't think the right answer is
that if I make a mistake I should be prepared for an
inexplicable outcome.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
