On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:33:07 -0600, Mark Zelden wrote:

>On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:34:23 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I disagree with Ted that you've been "lucky" with ISPF edit since it
>does use an ENQ to protect on a member level basis.  But that only works
>if everyone plays by those rules.   Also there has been some extra
>protection for a *long* time that keeps two tasks from opening a PDS
>for output (IEC143I 213-30 abend).   I'm sure the archives are filled
>with information about this sort of thing.
>
(Sorry I neglected to include this in my previous post).  See:

Link that you currently have selected

   Linkname: Appendix A. ISPF enqueue processing for data integrity
        URL: 
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ISPZPC70/A.0

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to