I use the Hummingbird HostExplorer product, which I have set to 65x200, and it works okay with TPX. Of course, when I connect to it, TPX thinks I'm a MOD2. But for each session I have set up in TPX, I have the Modent name set to D4C32XX3, which overrides what TPX thinks my screen size is. 65x200 works well with TSO/ISPF, NetView, SDSF on JES2, and eJES on JES3. Mark T. Regan, K8MTR CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991)
________________________________ From: Brian Peterson <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 5:23:48 PM Subject: Re: Screen size (was 3270 emulator cost) Thanks to Ed's encouragement, I've switched my sessions to 62x160 and am very happy with the result. My screen size choices are limited to those supported by TPX, and 62x160 was the largest that TPX could handle (with one fix which was published about a year ago) - TPX basically only handles the standard mod-2,3,4,5 and the 3290 panel sizes 62x80, 31x160, and my favorite, 62x160. Brian On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:28:13 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote: >On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:42:29 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote: >> >>Hmmm. I'm "playing" with it now and it looks pretty good (other than I >>can't figure out how to get a 90x142 display like I'm accustomed to.) > >Wow! Thanks, Ed. I've been using 62x142 for a while. Thought that 62 >lines was all ISPF would support. I just tried 90x142 and I think I'm >hooked already. > >-- >Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
