I was stuck in 54x80 until I followed this thread. Thanks to it, I was inspired to discover the proper ISPF screen size setting to get around the "screen size flip" going in and out of >80 character data. I always hated 27x133 because of that (reverting back to 24x80 on the main menu - I like having more rows).
I'm not sure I could get used to 90x142, though... Regards, Art Gutowski Ford Motor Company On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:10:12 -0500, Mark Pace <[email protected]> wrote: >I do NOT understand how you do it. Even with a 17" wide screen monitor the >font is to small to read comfortably. Anymore than 43 lines is to hard on my >eyes. > >On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Marchant <m42tom- [email protected]>wrote: > >> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:42:29 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote: >> > >> >Hmmm. I'm "playing" with it now and it looks pretty good (other than I >> >can't figure out how to get a 90x142 display like I'm accustomed to.) >> >> Wow! Thanks, Ed. I've been using 62x142 for a while. Thought that 62 >> lines was all ISPF would support. I just tried 90x142 and I think I'm >> hooked already. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
