I'm aware of the distinction, but have always felt that that's a fairly
reasonable working definition of "default", at least up until a reassignment.

i

------ Original Message ------
Received: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:39:27 PM COT
From: Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Multi-dimensional arrays in REXX

> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:21:31 -0500, Ian S. Worthington wrote:
> 
> >Regrettably you can only set a default for the stem as a whole, not for a
> >subset of the variable space.
> >
> It is *not* a default, and Rexx documentation avoids
> the possibly misleading use of "default" by a correct
> description that:
> 
>     X. = 'blank'
> 
> assigns [in effect] the value 'blank' to every possible
> member of the compound variable with stem X.
> 
> Not only freshman and sophomore Rexx programmers fail to
> understand this, but even IBM developers have caused a
> violation of the specification by introducing a
> misconceived optimization.
> 
> -- gil
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to