On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:57:06 -0400, Rich Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <listserv%[email protected]> you write:
>>On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:44:18 -0700, Smith, Sean M
>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>I am modifying an assembler program and I have a need to have a single
>>>digit unique identifier for a system within a SYSPLEX.
>>
>>Don't forget that a parallel sysplex can have 32 systems. I think that will
>>make it difficult to have a single-digit identifier that will work in all
>>possible configurations :-)
>
>Your thinking of just digits.  Keep in mind that a byte can contain any
>of 256 values (x'00' - x'FF').  If you want to stick to printable, the
>letters and numbers give you 36 different values.

Sean's the one who limited it to "single digit unique identifier" in his
original message.  I agree, of course, that if you allow other characters
you can handle more than 32 systems.  

-- 
  Walt Farrell, CISSP
  IBM STSM, z/OS Security Design

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to