On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:07:30 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote:
>... >The scenario presented is that someone elsewhere has unloaded >a load module library, to which he has proper authority, with >ADRDSSU and transmitted the archive by FTP, carrier pigeon, >whatever, to me here, where I have at least READ authority >on that archive. It was the intent of the original owner >that I be able to restore it here. I acknowledge that I >may (probably) need to rename the received data set to match >a profile in which I have WRITE authority. But why should >the system prevent my doing this based on the assumption that >the local RACF rules can somehow be applied to the sender's >environment? I have not been following this thread closely, but your summary of the problem reminded me that I've recently been in the same situation but DID NOT have the problem. IBM sent a backup of some datasets in ADRDSSU format. I defintely do not have even READ access to the original dataset names in our security system (ACF2) or ADRDSSU ADMIN authority but had no trouble doing a ADRDSSU restore with rename. Could the problem be options used to either create or restore the backup? Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
