Thanks for that heads-up, Otto. Bob
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Schumacher, Otto Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CF Level Considerations at DR Depending on the level we had to increase the size of the structures for CICS log and shunt before the regions would come back up. Regards Otto Schumacher Technical Support, CICS -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richards, Robert B. Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: CF Level Considerations at DR Does anyone have any experience or considerations with having a higher CF Level at your primary site than at the disaster recovery site? Are there any issues I should be aware of? Due to implementing STP here, we are fairly current and may be at a higher level than our DR provider has installed. I am already planning to use SIMETRID for the CLOCK00 stuff as we are going to be on one machine there and are dropping the Sysplex Timers. Bob ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
