>In this case it substitutes 2048 with 3584. I am befuddled by this. Could >someone shed some light?
A long time ago (OS/390 2.10?). IBM made IDCAMS 'smarter' in calculating CI sizes for indexes, over-riding your specifications, as needed. >Would this cause a problem for the STC DFHSM? This should only cause a problem if the larger size caused you to run out of space on the volume. But, why not recycle HSM and find out? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
