"Diehl, Gary" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<448c07246fdb244e86554e7f2c6ee7a904f42...@a0116-xpo0114-s.swdc.ad.a
llstate.com>...
> I agree with Mark Zelden.  When we looked at trying to find a way to
put
> development batch in a different service class than production batch,
> when it runs on a different system in the sysplex but uses exactly the
> same job name (for testing - same in test as in production), we ended
up
> with this same methodology as the answer.  Lucky for us, our test
> systems share one MAS and the production systems share another, so we
> were able to differentiate based on SSC.  I wish, though, that JES
> Selection List Rules allowed for individually named system images to
be
> specified, it would make this sort of thing much easier (it surely did
> for DDF workloads!).

There is a big difference in between Jes batch and DDF is this area. 
With DDF the work is classified when it starts execution, so the
"current system" will be the system where the work runs. 
In the case of batch the work is classified when it enters the system
and put on the input queue to be selected and processed later by one the
the Jes members in the MAS complex. In this case, the "current system"
is not necessarily the system where the work will run.

This subject is quite similar to "system symbols in batch" and its
related dilemma's.

Kees.
**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
by return e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
registered number 33014286 
**********************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to