We hit ENQMAXA at 250,000.  IBM's recommendation was to double that number.  We 
did, and had no problems.  I doubt if you will have any problem with ENQMAXU 
either.

ESP holds a number of enqueues.  At our site I see about 95 for ESPMSTR; 65 for 
the aux a/s.  Those enqueues are long-term, not per event.

I wonder how close to ENQMAXU you were before hitting the 80 percent threshold. 
 The number is not externalized anywhere, but the counter is in GRS' virtual 
storage.  Ask IBM support for help finding it, or perhaps our friends on the 
list can suggest a method.  

db

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
J Ellis
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 3:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ENQMAXU/ENQMAXA

We have intermittently began seeing these messages in the log, followed by the 
'all clear now' one.

*ISG368E THE CONCURRENT UNAUTHORIZED REQUEST COUNT FOR ASID 0122 44  HAS 
EXCEEDED THE 80 PERCENT THRESHOLD OF THE SYSTEM-WIDE MAXIMUM,
 16384

I have spent some time sifting thru enque reports and haven't been able to 
correlate any Total Events counts to any number even approaching 16K, the 
address space in the message is the ESP aux a/s and ESP is just coming live in 
this 2 system plex (running STAR mode).

Is there anywhere to look or some D GRS command to be issued at the time of the 
message to see what qname/rname is being used, OR, short of dumping the A/S to 
see whats foing on inside of it from a grs view ?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to