On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Ron Wells <[email protected]> wrote:
> thanks .... looks like your right.... lan people has not updated the > server with all the names yet.. > That's vaguely scary -- you have two separate DNS that don't talk to each other? One should (FSVO "should") be a secondary, pull from the primary. Then you don't have this problem. ObAnecdote: In 1992 or so, we got our first Internet connection (9600BPS dialup, despite VP of Engineering asking, "Who would we talk to?"). I got to set up DNS on VM. We had no DNS on our LAN, so I wanted to make VM the primary. With a bunch of assistance from IBM, I finally got it working, but I concluded then -- and still believe -- that I was the only site in the world doing that. DB2 (then called SQL/DS) as the database. Then we got a "realer" connection, and our ISP became our primary. I followed the instructions for a secondary and it didn't work. Again, with much assistance from IBM, we finally discovered that BIND wasn't following the RFC for a TTL of 0 (I think; this was a loooong time ago, so don't hold me to that). Anyway, it was all quite the adventure. And a very long time ago, on a planet far, far away. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
