On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:52:12 -0400 P S <[email protected]> wrote: :>On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Edward Jaffe :><[email protected]>wrote:
:>> And, sometimes they're rejected even *after* they're implemented! :-D :>> http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0407&L=ibm-main-archives&P=R2529&I=1&X=- :>And I remember a VM session at SHARE where a requirement went from REJECTED :>to AVAILABLE in the space of 5 minutes -- IBM had misunderstood the :>requirement, and someone pointed out after the rejection was read that "Hey, :>that was added last release!" Me too (ISPF). Though I believe the requirement was understood, it was just not really reviewed before SHARE. Thus the old answer still stood. The IBM rep had no problem at all to add it to his statistics of user requests implemented in the product. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
