Similar advice as for the 'S222' thread. Consider that the user-supplied authorization routine could well be issuing an 'S913' abend.
. . JO.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile [email protected] James Robinson <james.robin...@c ROWLEY.COM> To Sent by: IBM [email protected] Mainframe cc Discussion List <[email protected] Subject .edu> Re: Antwort: Command program from the cbt 07/02/2009 07:29 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected] .edu> Also, a failing RACHECK should have issued a SMF type 80 record. That might tell you what resource is complaining. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Kelly Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Antwort: Command program from the cbt <snip> CMD107I SAFRC04: USING SECONDARY CHECK CMD913E UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THE COMMAND PROGRAM - JOB ABORTED <unsnip> Check the 'command' program, it's issuing the message. Sounds like it has multiple SAF calls and you're in neither. Jack Kelly 202-502-2390 (Office) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
