Has Pat Artis weighed in on this yet?
<snip> We have done extensive in-house testing comparing standard non-zHPF DX/LR[E], non-zHPF PFX, and zHPF channel programs. The tests measure elapsed time, connect time, and throughput. We see *significant* differences between these three approaches, with zHPF being by far the best. IBM has an IOS benchmark program they run. Their zHPF results--and pointers to white papers, etc.--can be found in Paul Hagan's presentation here: http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/c6192fb3a43261248525 6d970082de57/5c9807ba6ed049bb862575bb005ac85c?OpenDocument </snip> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
