2012/7/5 Elardus Engelbrecht <[email protected]> > Marc Manuel wrote: > > >Sometimes some jobs are failing (they where working fine with the old > library) : > > Do you see any repeating pattern with those jobs? > >> I don't understand this question
> > >20.30.07 JOB12951 IEF233A M > 1407,PRIVAT,SL,PSSA0012,SSA00120,SAVEXT.VCF495B.G0914V00 > >20.31.06 JOB12951 IEC501A M > 1407,PRIVAT,SL,COMP,PSSA0012,SSA00120,SAVEXT.VCF495B.G0914V00 > >20.31.08 JOB12951 IEC147I > 613-1C,IFG0194J,PSSA0012,SSA00120,OUT001,1407,K21059.SAVEXT.VCF 029 > > 613 against another dataset? > >> Yes all other datsets (about 150) > Those first two messages are about a minute spaced out! Are you sure they > are referred by the same STEP/dataset? > >> Yes, in the snippet you can see the jobname, stepname, jobnumber > ... > > >I have no idea why there is a "double" mount. > > "double" mount with different mount messages? With elapsed wall clock time > of 59 seconds? > >> That is what I see in the job log > > >When I retry the job later, it works fine... > > On z/OS v1.13? You must have other allocation exit or message exit or > something else... > Or you must have a tape management software intercepting those mounts... > >> I don't think I have any exit, could CA-TLMS do such a thing ? > Groete / Greetings > Elardus Engelbrecht > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
