In
<3b38acf0ae98134cb2ee14b925447c5804095...@001fsn2mpn1-023.001f.mgd2.msft.net>,
on 07/19/2012
at 12:22 PM, "Brown, Larry - RD, St. Louis, MO"
<[email protected]> said:
>I'm suspecting there may have been some JCL changes to blksize,
>buffers, and things like that required, but the programmer is unaware
>of any of those changes he should have made.
I'd have to check the documentation, but doesn't BUFND=181 mean 181
control intervals of data buggers? That's more than the 409600 given
for BUFSP. Shouldn't BUFSP be BUFND*4096+BUFNI*2560?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
