Peter Relson wrote: >>1. Is it still needed to reload SMFPRMxx after doing the SET PROG=xx? >>2. Is it still needed in PROGxx to use EXIT DELETE and LPA DELETE and then >>later again with LPA ADD and EXIT ADD? If not, can I then just replace all >>those EXIT commands with one which is using REPLACE?
>1. No. Nor was it ever. You only reload SMFPRMxx with respect to exits when >you are changing the definitions of which exits are to be processed. You do >not do so when you are changing the exit routine(s) associated with an exit. >2.You certainly do not need to do EXIT DELETE then ADD if you are using >REPLACE. But if you were ever doing LPA DELETE you probably ought not to be >doing that, unless you can guarantee that no exit processing is underway when >you do the LPA DELETE. LPA DELETE says that you have made sure (in whatever >way you can do that; often there is no such way) that no processing is >currently using the module and thus the storage can be freed. Adding to LPA is >fine (I'd even say desirable) but not necessary if your EXIT ADD specifies the >data set in which the system is to find the module. Thanks for you answers. It answered all of my questions. Thanks! Fact is: I'm using SMFPRMxx to drop exits properly to be replacecd. Then I use EXIT DELETE, LPA DELETE, LPA ADD then EXIT ADD. Then I use SMFPRMxx to bring that exit back. Now due to your kind reply, it is not needed! Many Thanks! :-) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
