What happened to your sycophants, Metz? Make a sound like a bell?
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In <[email protected]>, on
08/21/2012
at 09:58 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
But IBM, with little clue, requires ISPPLIB to be allocated when
running ISPF in batch. It might, rather be a courtesy for ISPSTART
in batch to fail if ISPPLIB _is_ allocated, with a warning
That would be an incredibly dumb thing for IBM to do, and breaking
ISPF would hardly be a faver to the user.
to the apparently clueless user.
That comment explains why you are waiting for PKB, since you are
joining Poncelet in calling people clueless just because you don't
understand the issues.
It has since deteriorated into name-calling.
PKB..
you started it,
Wrong again.
(Awaiting PKB.)
See above.
Using JCL to start a terminal session doesn't count.
ROTF.LMAO!
And I'll confess that as a POC I have used a batch job to launch
ISPGUI, using panels, largely cluelessly.
Well, that doesn't surprise me.
But I consider that interactive as opposed to batch. In OS,
everything starts with JCL; there must be another meaningful
distinction between batch and interactive.
There are several. RTFM,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
