On 26 Aug 2012 07:59:31 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

>[email protected] (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
>> What's impressive here is that they don't buy off-the-shelf hardware
>> systems; they design their own.
>
>at hundreds of thousands blades in a megadatacenter and multiple
>megadatacenters spread around the world ... they claim that they can
>build their own for 1/3rd the price of brand name blades. they also have
>done quite a bit of research into reliability of different commodity
>components and buy in quantity for total cost of ownship. They also tend
>to have some leverage over vendors that sell into the megadatacenter
>server market.
>
>with the enormous reduction in cost of hardware that they've been able
>to achieve (if IBM has base price of $1815 for e5-2600 blade or
>approx. $3.44/BIPS ... and megadatacenter may be able to achieve 1/3rd
>that ... compared to $560,000/BIPS for z196) ... other costs start to
>play an increasing role. The megadatacenters have also pioneered much of
>the green datacenter efforts ... radically reducing power and cooling
>costs ... establishing power&cooling cost measures per unit of computing
>... somewhat analogous to the TPC council ... total cost per transaction
>(gives results sorted by performance, price/performance and
>watts/performance). A few recent posts mentioning mainframes
>and TPC benchmarks:

Are there any benchmarks available comparing a z series against a
blade configuration doing the same work and comparing the cost per
benchmark unit?  Given the complexity of instruction sets for both
Intel and the z series and the different nature of them, I agree with
others that straight instruction speed comparisons may be meaningless.
For example how much of the work for an i-o is done by the main
processor on a blade versus on the z series?  What is the MP effect on
the blades versus the z series?

Clark Morris
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012.html#23 21st Century Migrates Mainframe with 
>Clerity
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012h.html#20 Mainframes Warming Up to the Cloud
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012i.html#16 Think You Know The Mainframe?
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012i.html#89 Can anybody give me a clear idea 
>about Cloud Computing in MAINFRAME ?
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012j.html#1 Can anybody give me a clear idea 
>about Cloud Computing in MAINFRAME ?
>
>One of the issues is they have done significant excess provisioning for
>"on-demand" requirements and so have pressured vendors for
>implementations that drastically cut power use when idle ... but able to
>instantaneously come up to full-speed.
>
>They've also openly published their findings ... hoping to encourage the
>component vendors to compete & improve their products. However, their
>findings have also tended to influence blade component selection and
>assembly by others.
>
>recent posts in this thread
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012l.html#16 X86 server
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012l.html#18 X86 server
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012l.html#19 X86 server
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012l.html#20 X86 server
>http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012l.html#25 X86 server

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to