To answer the question you asked, JES2 only accepts 2 digits for PROCLIB
definitions  It is still very old fashion.

A change request to JES2 might be accepted but I cannot see it being done
very quickly or soon.

And I do like JCLLIBs.  Experiment with the INCLUDE statement and JCLLIB
statements.  You might be able to put the includes like APPL in SYS1.PROCLIB
that specifices the JCLLIB sequence you want your users to access.

So your JCL might look like

//JOBCARD ...
//  INCLUDE MEMBER=APPL
//Remainder of job stream.

I am not sure if that would work, but it would be interesting to try it.
I do use that for STEPLIBs have not tried it for JCLLIBs.


Lizette


> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf
> Of Frank Swarbrick
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:10 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: JES2 JOBCLASS PROCLIB
> 
> We have the following:
> 
> JOBCLASS(?) AUTH=ALL,        /* All commnds accepted
>    [...]
>          PROCLIB=00,
>    [...]
> 
> PROCLIB(PROC00) DD(1)=(DSNAME=SYS2.&SYSNAME..PROCLIB),
>    [...]
> 
> PROCLIB(APPL)    DD(1)=(DSNAME=DEV.APPLIB.INCLUDE),
>    [...]
> 
> In our "application" jobs we specify:
> /*JOBPARM  PROCLIB=APPL
> 
> It looks like in the JES2 parmlib member the following limitation is in
place:
> PROCLIB=nn|00
>   Specifies the default procedure library number (00-99) which is to be
used for this
> job class.
> 
> Am I missing something, or is the use of the JOBPARM JES2 JCL statement
the only
> way that a non-numeric JES2 PROCLIB concatentation can be referred to?
> 
> Obviously we could just rename PROCLIB(APPL) to something like PROCLIB(10)
and
> then add something like JOBCLASS(A) PROCLIB=10, so any job executing in
CLASS=A
> will use the "applications" proclib, PROCLIB=10.  I would prefer being
able to say
> PROCLIB=APPL or something, because "APPL" has more implicit meaning than
"10".
> 
> I am not a sysprog and cannot test this out myself.  I want to suggest it
to our
> sysprogs, but I want to make sure I am suggesting something that can be
done.
> 
> Thanks!
> Frank
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to