On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:42 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > I doubt that what you want is available without caveats. > > The notices section of all recent versions of the publication you call > the PoOps---Why the 's'?--- and I prefer to call the PrOp contain some > such weasel language as > > <begin extract> > All facilities discussed in this publication are not necessarily > available on every model. Furthermore, in some instances the > definitions have been structured to allow for some degree of > extendibility (sic), . . . For information about the characteristics > and availability of facilities on a specific model see the functional > characteristics publication for that model. > </end extract> > > You did not make clear just what you want to do with this information; > I can only guess, perhaps wrongly, thjat you want to relate the > usability of some assembly-language features to model numbers; and you > may well be able to do something of that sort usefully if only very > inexactly. > > John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA > The main item that varies between models is how much physical and virtual memory you can actually address. The z900 jumped beyond 31 bits, but the maximum creeps up a few bits with every model. -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
