I think so. But remember that those 8192 bytes must include any require 3270 protocol overhead bytes. Also remember the data bytes may be encoded. So that is not 8192 bytes of user data. Also, from what another person indicated, I don't know if the screen size limit applies if you are using DFT mode transfers.
-- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * [email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Thomas Berg > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 9:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: SV: Why File transfer through TSO IND$FILE is slower than > TCP/IP FTP ? > > Does that mean that when I use IND$FILE with a 64x128 screen it sends > 8192 bytes at a time ? > > > Regards, > Thomas Berg > _______________________________________________________ > Thomas Berg Specialist AM/SM&S SWEDBANK AB (publ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
