Shmuel wrote: <begin snippet> TSO was never a separate order number. It started as a feature of OS/360 MVS. <end snippet>
and he has here committed a [vulgar sense] oxymoron. OS/360 had an MVT but no MVS. --jg On 9/24/12, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[email protected]> wrote: > In <[email protected]>, on 09/24/2012 > at 09:29 AM, John Eells <[email protected]> said: > >>MVS might have at some point included TSO. Perhaps sooner, but since >> MVS Version 1 if I recall correctly, TSO and later TSO/E have been >>either: > >>a) Different products with separate product (order) numbers > > TSO was never a separate order number. It started as a feature of > OS/360 MVS. TSO Command Package and TSO/E replaced portions of the > free base until TSO/E became a standard set of components and the free > base went away. Initially TSO was originally a SysGen option, but then > SysGen went away. > >>b) For TSO/E, an element of OS/390 or z/OS. > > I normally read "element" as meaning a single FMID, which is not the > case here. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
