Just to save me time creating and testing, what happens in that case? I know that, in batch, when linking into a PDS[E], I use the NOSTORENX so that the new program is not put/updated in the library. I don't really see any reason to allow a non-executable module to be placed in the library. But I run in a simplistic shop, too. IIRC, if you tried to run such a problem in batch, fetch would cause an abend.
-- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * [email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: GIM44336S > <snip> > > Your people haven't learned the bitter lesson of attempting > to execute in the UNIX (USS) shell a program object that the > Binder has marked nonexecutable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
