On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:19:59 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] <[email protected]> wrote:
>I think you missed the distinction between submitting recalls and a process >causing recalls. At this shop it was not unusual for a user to submit an >Iefbr14 job to delete datasets thereby causing the recall of any dataset that >had been migrated. Since the recall is serial, it would result in one tape >mount per recall. Agreed that I missed that distinction. I agree there is ONE mount per recall. But I will stay with what I said about the problem of handling a lot of recalls requests and subsequent mounts. I think the IEFBR14 recall problem has been fixed in the last 5 years or so. AFAIK it is a setting in ALLOCxx member. Thanks Dave! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
