At 13:01 -0700 on 10/23/2012, George, William@FTB wrote about SARBCH
- PRINT all SEQ's of a GEN= for jobs:
I do know a LIST on the job with GEN=1000 and no SEQ will list each time
it ran within a GEN with their sequence numbers. With this info I could
construct another SARBCH job with 3 individual PRINT commands, one for
each SEQ number. However, due to how the process is setup, is all done
in REXX, it would add a tremendous amount of overhead to LIST each job
first, read in the results, then construct another SARBCH from the LIST
results. There are about 70 jobs I have to extract SAR reports from and
doing a single PRINT (or LOAD) would be FAR more efficient.
Any insights?
What happens if you ask for seq=4 when there are only 3 versions? If
it just tosses an error message and goes to the next commend, why not
just submit 100 commands asking for seq=1 to seq=100. Once it has
processed all the existent sequences, it will just ignore the
requests for the non-existent ones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
