Considering the year differences I would stick with the new one.
One place I was at was using an old (we are talking 1990's) on that
had a nasty bug.
I had too much on my plate to go after the newer one (that fixed the
bug). Since the problem only happened when the system was being z eod'd
and either the operators were too slow to catch it or another slang
term that I shouldn't use.
If the date was say 2011 or there abouts I would probably use the one
from 2006 unless the comments on what it fixed pertained to the
latest release.
Ed
On Nov 16, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:55:05 -0600, Jeff Holst
<[email protected]> wrote:
I was looking for the SMFDUMP program and thought I rememebered
that it was on the CBT tape. And indeed it is.
In fact, I found two versions of the program, in files 684 and
686. They appear to have the same origins, but the two programs
are a bit different.
The dates of last updates appear to be 2004 for 684 and 2006 for
686, should that make a difference to anyone.
I have seen a number of references in the archives to the version
in file 686. Is this considered to be the superior version?
Jeff Holst
I'm not going to look, but make sure one or both has this required
change
from OS/390 2.8 that I made to my version in 2000.
WTO TEXT=(MSG1,MSG2),MF=(E,MSG007) ISSUE MSG
WAS CHANGED TO:
WTO TEXT=((MSG1,),(MSG2,)),MF=(E,MSG007)
--
Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS
mailto:[email protected]
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at http://
expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
