Any common-storage subpool is fine. >The doc says the resmgr exit runs out of master does that mean that the >storage I obtain for the resmgr exit to run should have an >Alet pointing to master
No it does not mean that. It means that the resmgr gets control with home=*master* (ASID 1). It does mean that if this is truly an address space RESMGR you could conceivably obtain storage in ASID=1 (although that cannot be done by specifying an ALET that "points to master" unless you are already running in ASID 1 in which case the ALET is unnecessary). You also did not identify exactly what kind of RESMGR you truly established. What is your invocation, and what did you do to get your module into the storage you obtained for it? If your RESMGR is not getting control, among the choices are -- you did not identify it properly to the system -- the storage you think you obtained does not have the module you think it does -- for a task termination resgmr, the task has not terminated -- for an address space resmgr, the address space has not terminated. An address space resmgr should almost never be used in isolation. There should be a task termination resmgr to deal with termination of the jobstep program task. Only if that resmgr cannot do its job and the address space does terminate should an address space resmgr have anything to do. Note that a batch job's address space (an initiator) does not terminate when the batch job terminates. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
