On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:59:28 -0500, Martin, Larry D wrote:
>
>IBM Disk capacity tables show 3390-27 as 32760 Cylinders
>
That number is spookily close to 2^15.  Was it chosen by design
for tolerance of code that might malfunction with a negative
halfword cylinder number?  Has some such code been broken by
the 3390-54?

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to