In
<cae1xxdf-ycp4hb98wrnk1twf1heqgbh_mx76arfstwovtrk...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 11/29/2012
at 08:26 AM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>This is the second time in recent days trhat Shmuel has commented
>adversely on one of my posts.
Don't make stupid errors and I won't comment on your stupid errors.
>In both cases he is the one who is talking nonsense,
The fact that you don't understand doesn't make it nonsense. RTFM.
>in this case
While I don't believe in quoting extraneous text, it is certainly
inappropriate to describe "this case" as "flagrant nonsense" without
quoting it.
"Nonsense; that's not even true for an authorized application that
specifies GLOBAL=YES; ownership is at the task and address space
levels. What is true is that the owning task can delete a module
loaded with GLOBAL=YES while code in another address space is
executing it and that tasks in the same address space can step on each
other."
Again, RYFM.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
